Corrina
Gordon-Barnes
Why
do we protest, or engage in any form of activism? Is it simply to change
something in our world, or does it fulfil a deeper need?
When ecstatic
shoppers descended upon the brand new Primark store in
No-one likes to
be told that what they’re doing is wrong. There is every difference between
waving placards at shoppers with sweatshop labour statistics, and creating this
curious, seductive scene which draws people into conversations about whether it
would be more interesting to shop less and live more.
When creativity
and protest intersect like this, it’s not only a more impactful way of engaging
the naysayers and the misinformed into more meaningful conversation, it's also
more impactful for those of us protesting ourselves. If we feel empowered by
the experience, we are more likely to do it again and engage more deeply.
Indeed, here in
In the market
square on Sept 21st, many of us participated in a ‘flash mob’; at exactly
12:18, our mobile phones started ringing and strangers emerged from all sides,
holding high those ringing phones. Our common goal was to send out an
unexpected ‘wake up’ call about the need for a fair and ambitious global
climate treaty. Across the globe, other paralleled events took place
simultaneously.
This is Protest
2.0 - more collaborative and engaging than its predecessor. And the scope of
creative protest is limited only by our imaginations.
Rather than
campaigning against Dow Chemicals, we could record a press conference as a
spokesperson from Dow, announcing that we take full responsibility for the
Bhopal Disaster and that we are paying compensation to the people affected, and
thus provoking Dow to deny, again, that they will ever pay any compensation.
Stunts like
these provide us with moments like those in the film ‘The Truman Show’ when
cracks start appearing in the fabricated reality. The veil slips. Chinks of light
break through. The sleepwalker starts rubbing her eyes.
This is
activism which entertains in order to engage. Like any superb teacher
knows, these are the conditions needed for deep, experiential learning - for
real change to happen.
By using creativity,
the novel and the surprising, we can respond to that which repels us in our
environment without needing to look directly at it. We can channel our instinct
to innovate and influence in the direction of our common enemy: stagnation. We
can learn how to disarm the status quo without taking up arms ourselves.
So, rather than
sending a petition around about the dangers of swine flu vaccination, we could
post a video to YouTube entitled ‘How To Make Your Own Flu Vaccine’, a
hilarious ‘infomercial’ showing ingredients such as mercury and detergent
merrily being whisked into a substance that will be syringed into our arms.
Protest 2.0
makes us like martial artists - we stand in our own centre and our very refusal
to push and fight is what causes the great unworkable to topple over. We can
find ways of challenging situations without threatening the people within them;
instead of aggressively tearing down the old, this is creatively and gentling
dismantling it so that no-one need be the accused or the victim. This is the
“Why don’t we....?” and “What if we....?” approach to evolving our world.
How we measure
the success of any activism is impossible - and reassuringly so. We can never
know the impact of our actions so it is wise to put arrogance aside. Instead,
we can use a different measure: how much are we impacted by our
involvement?
Both the Free
Shop and the Wake Up call experiences left me feeling more empowered, more
connected with others and more alive.
Protest itself
can also fuel a very healthy and necessary part of our human spirit - that part
which is unapologetically revolutionary, fiercely able to make our hopes and
needs known.
As activists,
we need to concern ourselves just as much with our evolution as with
changing ‘out there’. We want to walk the talk, become the kind of people
others want to live with: those who can handle conflict and disagreement in a
participatory and inclusive way, knowing that they are essential ingredients of
our societal evolution.
We will never
arrive at some ‘finished’ society where everything is sorted out and fixed. For
most of us, it’s a relief to recognise that there will always be the need for
creative activism. Our desire for the next best material thing can be replaced
by a craving for the next great radical act. That spark of the revolutionary
within each of us can continue to lead us forward in exciting and radical
directions.
May that never,
ever end.
Corrina
Gordon-Barnes is a Certified Professional Co-Active Coach (CPCC).
Excellent article, Corrina. Brings to mind the Yesmen, whose film of the same name, is very inspiring and funny. People may still shop at Primark but they may feel a twinge of guilt, a crack of awareness about the wider context in which they live their lives, beyond the shopping centre.
Posted by: Nick Stibbs | Friday, November 20, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Wow - I really related to this article. It was as if my thoughts and feelings had been put, eloquently, into words by it's author.
I, personally, hate conflict and as Corrina says, 'No-one likes to be told that what they’re doing is wrong.' So why start a fight?
Creative protest seems like a really cool way to go......
Corrina you are an artist painting clear and beautiful pictures with your words. Thank you xxxx
Posted by: Sandie Roach | Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Nick - Thanks for your comment. The Dow Chemicals stunt was indeed orchestrated by the Yes Men. What strikes me is how much fun people can have engaging with very serious topics. You might also enjoy the shenanigans of ImprovEverywhere with their flash mob actions; my personal favourite is Food Court Musical - a spontaneous all-singing all-dancing mini-musical in an LA shopping mall. And here in Cambridge, the Free Shop idea continues, appearing outside Primark again this Saturday (28th November).
Sandie -Thank you. There are many people like you who hate conflict and yet who want to change aspects of our society. This kind of activism offers that possibility. When fighting against others, the best outcome possible is win-lose which I don't believe fully satisfies us. Someone once said: 'It's like drinking poison and expecting our enemy to drop dead". With this kind of creative activism, we are more likely to enjoy a win-win.
Posted by: Corrina Gordon-Barnes | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 11:57 AM